Isn't hell enough to be so unsure of anything? What a torment to remain with no assurance of purpose or destiny.
well ic,
Gehenna is right here on earth, right? What if “hel” is just a bad translation, by Norse/Angle scribes, who maybe even meant to be completely sincere, but they just had no better term to translate into? Bc idk ok, but it seems like hel might be just a useful fiction for ppl who want to go up to heaven after they have died?
No one has ever gone up to heaven but He Who came down from it, the son of man, All go to the same place, You came from dust, and to dust you will return, etc
What kind of wild inquiry and second guessing is that?
Salvation from the futile emptiness of agnosticism for one.
i only meant to ask what you believed that you were being “saved” from, and whether you could Quote that, ic. You might contemplate why you cannot Quote “from the fires of eternal hell” one single time, and see that the question is really a central one, but i also get that the power of public opinion is a strong one, and this may not interest you right now.
not sure why you might deem agnosticism “futile emptiness” so ill put it down to something like “fear of the unknown,” and resist pointing out how futile and empty a belief in an ”afterlife” that you cannot Quote (either) would be; but just so you know, i believe in God, ok. Maybe not the Olde Whyte Guy with the beard and the robe, but regardless
You can't.
Savation is not only with God for eternity but filled with God for eternity.
.
but wadr (with all due respect) you have not addressed where your understanding of “eternity” came from, nor why it does not come from
aidios, but rather
aion. So again we have the great delusion here between us, in your gnostic statement
“Salvation is not only with God for eternity but filled with God for eternity”
when the Bible clearly states otherwise, as i have already recently Quoted
So being conformed to the image of His Son is something that never even entered into most people's hearts to even ask
to even ask? sorry, im not quite following here, but imo this is a completely diff subject anyway, something one does here on
erets
I don't go to Hollywood to get my beliefs on God.
i meant that as allegory, but my point was that you surely got many or most of your beliefs on God from people who seemed sincere, that you were giving money to, ic, same as me and most every other believer, and its only later that we come to understand how the money changes the transaction, and makes it the sale of a product, and that the truth we might not have been so eager to pay for.
but see,
No son of man may die for another’s sin…, No one has ever gone up to heaven…, All go to the same place, and you and your sons will be here with me (Samuel), you have to find these all by yourself, see, bc you never will hear them in a “church” bro. Esau and his needing
red stew they stay far away from, see
I have no problem with Jesus coming in a way to demonstrate He is God over all nature.
He the angels said to the eyewitnesses of His physical ascension that AS they saw Him physically ascend they would see Him physically return in the same way they saw Him going up into heaven.
then wadr that would make
standing there, looking up into the sky a perfectly reasonable thing to do, wouldnt it? You might note that you inserted “physically” all by yourself there too, fwiw; there is no
phusis in the passage, see.
You might contemplate the possibility that the passage is constructed the way it is the suggest a
spiritual ascension--or you might see that
No one has ever gone up to heaven but He Who came down from it, the son of man is now maybe more true, since i have no probs with a literal ascension if you like, but either way seems like there is going to be an adjustment there? or not
but again, you have added “return” wadr,
hupo strepho is not in there bro; there is no “Jesus hupo strepho” anywhere in the Bible! Weird, huh?
And when He had said these things, while they were looking on, He was lifted up, and a cloud took Him away from their sight.
And while they were looking intently into heaven as He went, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them,
Who also said, Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you beheld Him going into heaven. (Acts 1:9-11)
Besides, actual artifacts can simultaneously take on symbolic meaning. The two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
i agree, and it is a small thing to me, even if a misunderstanding, that i would even grant is encouraged, for a specific reason, that being ppls overwhelming desire to become immortal after they have died
Apollos waters
perhaps
Jesus will indeed
come in the same way He was taken, imo…but that does not mean that He will literally, physically “return,” see, at least not necessarily.
Return to Me and I will return to you
fwiw i understand that this is maybe frustrating for you, and i should prolly say that as far as i am concerned, you are a good hearted, earnest person who seems to be seeking wisdom, and i dont expect you or anyone to believe as i do ok. For all i know you are a son of man, and might spend ”eternity” in “heaven,” but i just hate to see ppl consumed with that and forgetting that Christ came that we might have
LIFE, more abundantly, The kingdom of heaven is WITHIN