Front Page

Welcome to The Agnostic Forum!

If you are an agnostic or anyone else that is tired of discussions that become too political, polarizing, and partisan then this is the place for you.

What to expect:

1. Our forum is primarily for agnostics but we invite all others (atheists, Christians, etc.) to join.
2. We're a place for discussion and/or debate on various topics, like politics, religion, science, etc.
3. We're also a place that promotes an environment that is non-partisan, freethinking, and open-minded.

For more information, visit our About us section.

Trending Threads

AgnosticBoy

Polygamy was immoral according to a Catholic author. My response to this.

AgnosticBoy
  • Thread
  • Replies: 14
This takes us back to polygamy. Deuteronomy doesn’t explicitly endorse polygamy. It only implies it. And the later prophets show that such an implication is mistaken.

My response...

For one, though the Bible doesn’t say the Patriarchs’ polygamy is wrong, it shows it. Read about Abraham and Hagar, or David and Bathsheba, or Jacob and Leah. Again and again, kings and Patriarchs take multiple wives with disastrous consequences. We can read between the lines. Polygamy is shown to be a bad idea, even if it’s not said to be such.

Second, the prophets started using marital imagery to describe God and Israel. God is Israel’s husband. And he has only one chosen people. If God is not polygamous in such analogies, why should Israelites be?
[/QUOTE]
Later Judaism thus started to have doubts about earlier polygamous allowances. By the return from their Babylonian exile, Jews had largely abandoned the practice. And by Rabbinical Judaism, polygamy was completely condemned.

We can go farther. Even if the Old Testament supports polygamy (as we’ve just shown, it doesn’t), the New Testament is what matters most for if its still allowable for us Christians. And plainly, the New Testament doesn’t allow it. Jesus says a man should be joined to his wife, and they will become one flesh (Matt. 19:3-6). Jesus defines adultery as even looking at another woman lustfully (5:27-28). And Paul commands that “each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband” (1 Cor. 7:2).

A clear picture emerges. Marriage is between two people: one man, and one woman. Polygamy—whether tolerated or condemned in previous generations—is not part of God’s ultimate design.

This should be expected, because polygamy really works only in a culture of male dominion. It doesn’t work if a woman is supposed to be an equal and integral member of family and society, as the Bible clearly teaches. Whose in-laws do we see at Christmastime? Who gets priority when hubby is in the mood? How are the children raised with multiple, equal women acting as mom? How are decisions made? Things inevitably devolve into what actually happened in the Bible’s stories of polygamy: one wife playing second fiddle, one wife domineering, one set of children fading into the background, and one husband with a throbbing headache.

So we can confidently say that biblical marriage is between one man and one woman. Despite the controversy about the “man” and “woman” part of the definition, we need not question the word “one.” Polygamy was once tolerated in God’s plan, but it showed itself prone to domination and domestic strife. And so God’s people abandoned it, and Jesus condemned it. Frankly, I’m happy for that—and so is my wife.
Source: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/does-the-bible-permit-polygamy

My response will be in the next post. I welcome all others to chime in.
M

“The Gospel of John” has an anonymous author

Multicolored Lemur
  • Thread
  • Replies: 48

“ . . . The Gospel according to John has long been appealing to Latter-day Saint readers because of its symbolism and high Christology, which are similar to that of the Book of Mormon and the revelations of Joseph Smith in the Doctrine and Covenants. . . .

.

.

“Like the other Gospels, the Gospel of John is formally anonymous, meaning that its text never directly identifies its author. . . .

.

.
AgnosticBoy

Thought Crimes

AgnosticBoy
  • Thread
  • Replies: 19
Jesus said this in Matthew 5:27-28:
27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery. 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

For Discussion:
1. Is just the thought of something considered a sin?
AgnosticBoy

The Brain as a Medium for Consciousness

AgnosticBoy
  • Thread
  • Replies: 48
For several years, I've tried to explain the relationship between consciousness and the brain. I've recently settled on a safe and reasonable conclusion - one that isn't needlessly restrictive and that also fits the data. Today, I used Ai to aid in fleshing out my view, and I'll share some of the key details here.

My theory: The brain as a medium for consciousness. (Responses are from Grok which is like a ChatGpt but it's on Twitter or X).

What does this mean?
Saying the brain is a medium for consciousness suggests...
AgnosticBoy

The political side of Jesus's life and Parallels with today's politics

AgnosticBoy
  • Thread
  • Replies: 4
In Israel, political and religious factions were one and the same. Back then, it was Pharisees and Sadducees. Today, we have conservatives and liberals.

The Pharisees were the most religiously conservative leaders. They had the most influence among the common working poor, who were the majority. They believed that a king would come one day to conquer Rome with violence and free their nation. Some preyed upon a mostly illiterate population by adding extra rules and requirements that were designed to force the working poor into a posture of subjugation.

The Sadducees were wealthy aristocrats who had a vested financial interest in Roman rule. They were in charge of the temple, and they didn’t believe any savior king was coming. They made themselves wealthy by exacting unfair taxes and fees from the labor of their own people and by contriving money-making schemes that forced the poor to pay exorbitant prices to participate in temple sacrifice—a critical part of their religion.
Source: https://hegetsus.com/en/articles/would-jesus-be-fed-up-with-our-politics-too
AgnosticBoy

Why does God allow evil?

AgnosticBoy
  • Thread
  • Replies: 22
This is one of those big questions in life that probably every human wants an answer for - problem of evil.

Here's how Google's search ai explains it:
The "problem of evil" is the philosophical and theological challenge of reconciling the existence of widespread evil and suffering with the existence of a perfectly good, all-powerful, and all-knowing God.
  • Published
    Oct 3, 2020
  • Page views
    368,542

Members online

No members online now.
Administrator | Moderator | Regular

Latest profile posts

AgnosticBoy rebel AgnosticBoy wrote on rebel's profile.
If you don't mind me asking, which Portland are you from? Maine, Oregon? I've been to Portland Oregon. Beautiful city with a mountain in the middle.
Watching Captain America: Brave New World