In my opinion, free-will exists to some extent. While we can't act directly against our code--someone with a severe mental illness or physical injury can't say that they are completely healed all of the sudden, in most cases, we are capable of changing our situation gradually with daily decisions. I define free-will as in the freedom of choice. When you are subject to natural, social, or divine restraints, there's still slight choices that you can make to overcome them over time. It may not be enough to destroy said restraints--that shouldn't be one's goal in life as it's an impossible one to accomplish head on, but it's enough to get to a place where you are happy enough with yourself and your circumstances, also some--not all--restraints can be overcame from doing what you can right now. Despite anything, you have a choice of what you do with what you're given. I would say most people have free-will those without it are usually those with severe health issues who have to depend on copious amounts of doctors and drugs to live. There are people with no free-will but it's usually those that require consistent care and are very dependent of others to take care of themselves and have to depend on someone else to make decisions as to how they would live for them. Babies as well lack free will since they are incapable of determining or changing the situation that their given and depend solely on someone else for their care. So, free-will exists, but not everyone has it and it can be striped away from someone if natural, social, or divine restraints exceed human capabilities.