Do scientists deal with the supernatural?
ChatGPT response:
"Scientists typically dismiss the supernatural because it lacks empirical evidence and cannot be reliably tested or observed using the scientific method. Science relies on natural explanations and evidence-based reasoning to understand the world, and the supernatural often involves claims that cannot be subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny. While scientists are open to exploring unexplained phenomena, they require empirical evidence and repeatable experiments to consider them as part of the scientific discourse."
That explains how scientists have treated the supernatural, but what I question is if that is a necessary approach? Can scientists deal with supernatural?
Would studying or accepting supernatural events be bad for science?
ChatGPT response:
"Scientists typically dismiss the supernatural because it lacks empirical evidence and cannot be reliably tested or observed using the scientific method. Science relies on natural explanations and evidence-based reasoning to understand the world, and the supernatural often involves claims that cannot be subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny. While scientists are open to exploring unexplained phenomena, they require empirical evidence and repeatable experiments to consider them as part of the scientific discourse."
That explains how scientists have treated the supernatural, but what I question is if that is a necessary approach? Can scientists deal with supernatural?
Would studying or accepting supernatural events be bad for science?
Last edited: