Search results

  1. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    Another word about being a “Christian,” since i might be misunderstood; if one is lost in life, a criminal or whatever, on drugs, Becoming a Christian of any stripe can genuinely save you imo, ok? Now you have surely entered an ego-affirming cult of sol invictus lie also, and i dont mean “saved”...
  2. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    only you are maybe not considering how prevalent your beliefs are, Scooter; how broad. Doesnt pretty much everyone believe that Jesus is returning, tomorrow, and that everyone else is going to hel? I have Indians asking me how they might attain heaven and avoid hel now even, lol. So, ya I...
  3. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    ah, i prolly have like a hundred hours in those sites; already resolved most of the ones that interest me
  4. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    I guess that the cult of sol is the one who compiled the Bible, we can talk about later lol
  5. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    which i guess i should reiterate that im not blaming you or anything, ok? I guess its just part of the process, i did the same thing, more or less we are warned about scribes xlating the Bible to suit their audiences, and that is just a hard thing to realize after being indoctrinated into the...
  6. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    Well, i understand why you say that, but they have a vested interest, and it is def not in wising up the marks lol; they have a vested interest in ppl reading the Bible literally, which is kinda hard to splain, but sort of for the same reason you would trust the info coming from them more? i...
  7. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    say something once, why say it again? The other three are Dr’s fwiw, but i chose him on purpose also, the Dr’s are his refs—not that i am impressed by titles—and they write like they are trying to win a spelling bee lol So, im trying to imagine a way that i might communicate Eminence Front to...
  8. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    well, nor mine, for that matter, right? Doesnt mean that they arent legit tho, either. Do you have any evidence to suggest that they arent? Bc i have three witnesses for him that say they are ya, bam lets discredit an honest man lol
  9. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    We prolly shouldnt forget the He also chased some others around with whips tho, huh Anyway, go with that if you like, and best of luck in your quest for immortality ok
  10. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    They were first called Christians at Antioch, so ty Ok, ill be waiting. For the witnesses, i mean No sweat Scooter, you too
  11. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    Better questions to ask…well, you arent asking any questions i guess huh, since you know everything, but better Qs might be along the lines of why Jesus would even give the time of day to an oppressive occupier, let alone heal their “son,” esp in light of “even dogs get crumbs from the table”...
  12. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    It had abs nothing to do with his religious beliefs, as far as you know, but really what does that mean, Scooter? Besides that you are gnostic, i mean? No offense but you were completely unaware of the cult of sol until like yesterday, right? Yet it informs every single aspect of your religious...
  13. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i have a decent treatise on that somewhere, but you have to proceed from your own understanding i guess. I meant to use it as more of a meaningful allegory, a label. But apparently they were widely considered by Jews to be atheists, at least of a sort. Prolly a lot like contemporary devout Jews...
  14. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i am confident that you will see Him come down the same way you saw Him go up, Scooter, but you are also free to stand there looking up into the sky if you prefer Now, would that mean that you literally would be standing there, looking up into the sky? To you maybe, sure; but that does not mean...
  15. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    hopefully i made clear that Paul never said “To be absent…” and not that he didnt write the v not that i expect you to acknowledge that, either
  16. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    yet the Bible labels him “Centurion” nonetheless. So i am not seeking to dispute with it, nor you, tbh; we have two somewhat differing accounts of the Centurion, loaded with allegory, but in neither is it indicated that he was a believer, and what with the cult of sol invictus being so prevalent...