Recent content by William

Exploring the Relationship Between the Creator and Offspring Minds Philosopher 1. God is a-okay with the defined and granted form(s) of chattel slavery. And yet, he claims to also love his creation? How is this compatible? Philosopher 2. Because it is not a “command” to have slaves but it...

The Cosmic Odyssey: Exploring the Earth Mind as an Extension of Universal Consciousness Me. This is related to the problem of Mind. If a Mind ("God" as Christians oft refer to It "Him") created Life on Earth and allowed for the critters to experience pain, then this can be regarded as the Mind...

Journey Through Consciousness: Dialogues Between MIND and Mind on Existence, Illusion, and the Magic Within MIND. You wrote: “The mind that fears (irrationally) is a mind that does not understand itself in context and this applies equally to a mind that believes it is the superior or remains...

Philosopher 1. Science also doesn’t say “it was always there”. We don’t have evidence that the molecules in that chair always existed. Philosopher 3 Nor do we have evidence that they didn’t, as if they were within the thoughts of an eternal mind (the cause-mind) then they at least existed as...

The Father. ~Walking the walk… The Son. ~What Fun We Have! The Father. Emotional awareness Deranged. The Son. All over the place! The heart has its place and the brain and are best working together as a team… The Father. Saint Paul’s Dunedin The Son. Yes. Where I noted the art...

CHAPTER FIFTY- Philosophical Dialogue on God and the Complexity of Religious Perspectives Philosopher 1: Before I begin, I feel it is necessary to restate the purpose of this OP. 1213 made the following statement: "People have enough understanding to get it and if someone thinks he doesn't...

Points re Natural Philosophy/Natural Theism https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?p=691975#p691975 It is the Eternal Entity of Mindful Matter which created The Universe bubble. The EEMM was able to create The Universe bubble from its own makeup, because the makeup of the entity is...

P1: You think you speak for all, or even most agnostics? I warrant you don't. Your position is not one I've seen other agnostics take. P2: Fair enough. I will drop the idea that what I am explaining is a position which can be related to agnosticism since both Theists and Atheists have...

Philosophical Dialogue on the Eternal Immaterial Entity Cause and the Creation of the Universe Philosopher 2: So just to make sure I am understanding your argument completely, I will go through the claims you have made based upon the fact that the universe exists and had a beginning. 1...

Philosophical Discourse on Agnosticism: Exploring Characteristics, Disagreements, and Societal Influences Philosopher 1: But agnosticism isn't a single position. It's a range. I say again, if you believe otherwise, I'm happy for you to spell out the particulars of this "position" you...

I am currently at a point where I see no practical reason to continue assuming the position of Agnosticism and call myself an Agnostic due to the ingrained consensus definition attached to it by both Theists and Atheists/Materialists (as being a subset of atheism rather than a set position in...

Philosopher 2: Atheism itself has no creed to speak of. It is simply a position which has the identifying statement "lacking belief in God(s)." Philosopher 1: That's actually just a definition of "agnosticism" -- unless it's coupled with a stronger claim, like, "because such don't exist."...

More discussion on the prior post as follows; Philosopher 2: I don't think "lacking belief in gods" accurately defines Agnosticism either, but I agree that atheism has some work to do in properly defining its position. Philosopher 1: Right. There's more to agnosticism, even. Agnostics can exist...

From the Agnostic Position any such entity in the position of aloneness (POA ) might go the dishonest way, but probably wouldn't since it has no other thing to bounce off of - so it would be at the very least a sincere attempt to understand ones self as one is. Further to that, if it reached...

Philosopher 2: Atheism itself has no creed to speak of. It is simply a position which has the identifying statement "lacking belief in God(s)." Philosopher 1: That's actually just a definition of "agnosticism" Philosopher 2: I don't think "lacking belief in gods" accurately defines...